Tyranny of the Majority

Thursday September 10, 2009 - 10:29 am - By Patjdixon

“Well, Doctor, what have we got—a Republic or a Monarchy?”

“A Republic, if you can keep it.” (Ben Franklin responding to a lady following the Constitutional Convention)

President Obama gave a speech tonight.  Some of you liked it.  Some hated it.  Some don't know what to think.  Some had other things to do and will catch it later on the news.  Others are asking "What speech?  I was watching Entertainment Tonight."  This article is addressed to those not knowing what to think.  Those who watched Entertainment Tonight are beyond hope.

There were some parts I liked, most notably:

“More and more Americans pay their premiums, only to discover that their insurance company has dropped their coverage when they get sick, or won't pay the full cost of care ... That is heart-breaking, it is wrong, and no one should be treated that way in the United States of America.”

“Finally, our health care system is placing an unsustainable burden on taxpayers.”

“... that consumers do better when there's choice and competition. That's how the market works.”

There were many parts I didn't like.  I could write a very long article addressing such concerns that would be to laborious to read and are better addressed by many others more esteemed than I.  I would like to focus on one particular moment of the speech:

“That's why under my plan, individuals will be required to carry basic health insurance ... But we can't have large businesses and individuals who can afford coverage game the system by avoiding responsibility to themselves or their employees.”

This won’t affect me.  It probably won’t affect you.  The vast majority of people in our country would be able to prove to a federal agent that they carry health insurance.  It would only be a minority that are affected, so why should this be a problem?

You may have voted for Obama because you didn’t like Republican policies of intrusion into your life.  You felt your privacy and individuals rights were eroding with Republicans in charge.  You may have expected a new administration would better defend your ability to make your own choices concerning your life.

Long before you were born, our nation was born with the arrival of those individuals from the Old World to the New World shedding the tyranny of a master and embracing individual responsibility.  At that time, an individual took pride in his or her ability to make his or her own choices and accept responsibility for the outcome.  Clearly, those characteristics that defined us and made us great have yielded to a rebirth of the Old World.

I am not going to use terms like Socialist, Communist, Fascist, or Nazi.  I am going to use Collectivist.  When you think in terms of Collectivism, the majority rules.  The rights of the minority are ignored.  In the eyes of a Collectivists, the minority have no rights.  All that matters is what is good for the Collective, the majority.

The way that many authoritarian regimes are born come from the support of the majority.  They believe conditions will be better if they all conform to the will of a dictator.  If we do not learn from their history, we are doomed to repeat it.  The Soviet Union crumbled, North Korea is starving, Cuba is 50 years behind the times.

But we are a democracy!  Right?

The United States never has been, and was never intended to be, a democracy.  Young soldiers that died at Valley Forge and Bunker Hill never fought for democracy.  They fought for and established a Republic,  a form of government that used a democratic process to vote while conforming to a Constitution to protect the rights of the minority.

Health care in this country needs to be reformed.  Some of you like Barack Obama's plan.  Some like Republican plans.  I like John Mackey's plan.  So would Ben Franklin. 

Ben Franklin knew that a nation built upon individual rights might not last.  The Collectivists now threaten to end our Republic.  Can we keep it?

 Views : 1025 | Comments : 4 | Votes :
19
| Email | Print

Comments

FoolinChief | Points: +2 | Thursday September 10, 2009, 15:14 PM
2
Reply | Votes:

Dear Patrick,

You are absolutely correct: we were never intended to have a "Democracy" ...our Constitution established the framework for a democratic Republic.
Unfortunately, you are also altogether too correct in your observation that "Ben Franklin knew that a natio built upon individual rights might not last. Just a short time before his reported conversation with the woman on the street which you mention at the beginning of this article, Franklin (in urging the delegates still attending the Federal Convention of 1787 to give their signatures to the Constitution as as feigned endorsement) had commented...

"In these sentiments, Sir, I agree to this Constitution with all its faults, if they are such; because I think a general Government necessary for us, and there is no form of Government but what may be a blessing to the people if well administered, and believe farther that this is likely to be well administered for a course of years, and can only end in Despotism, as other forms have done before it, when the people shall become so corrupted as to need despotic Government, being incapable of any other."

Unfortunately, it seems fairly clear that Franklin never honestly expected that the government built upon this Constitution would last as long as it has!

All the Best, Patrick!

James Hines

P.S. ...Franklin's comments here (on September 17, 1787) make very clear allusions to the thoughts of William Penn in the Frame of Government of Pennsylvania from May 5, 1682
(A document which Franklin had been responsible for re-printing and had later edited to some extent.)

OldManOfHockey | Points: +3 | Thursday September 10, 2009, 21:39 PM
2
Reply | Votes:
Excellent column. The only thing I disagree with is the statement “Those who watched Entertainment Tonight are beyond hope.” I know at least one person who who playing drums and ignoring politics just about one year ago. Today he is campaigning for individual freedom. Don't give up on anyone.
JeffDaiell | Points: +2 | Thursday September 10, 2009, 22:49 PM
0
Reply | Votes:
Mr. D, a good point: majority rule is fine for deciding who should hold office, but not for deciding the limits of government power. For Texas and Liberty, Jeff Daiell Visit www.JeffDaiell.com today.
Jon_Roland | Points: +2 | Thursday September 10, 2009, 23:20 PM
1
Reply | Votes:
Jon_Roland's picture
I prefer the terms "statist" or "corporatist". "Collectivist" suggests support of the majority, and that is not really what is operating in statist or corporatist programs. The majority might acquiesce in such programs, or be duped by them, but it is not informed consent or support, but rather a kind of fraud or mistake. Recall that Benito Mussolini, who coined the term "fascist", once said that a better term would be "corporatist". From a libertarian standpoint, however, it might be more charitable to call their positions "error", or "misguided", because they are deceiving themselves as much as they try to deceive the rest of us. More harsh, but no less accurate, would be the traditional term, "fools". http://www.constitution.org http://jonroland.org http://constitutionalism.blogspot.com

Add Your Comments

Your Name: Anonymous
Login
Not Registered?
Register and post your comment in one easy step. It's fun and it's free!
Register Here

Top Commentors

1
 MarkPustka | Wednesday February 10, 2010, 7:55 AM
2
 Patjdixon | Friday February 19, 2010, 7:45 AM
3
 Robhill | Friday February 12, 2010, 1:45 AM
4
 Cindym | Monday March 8, 2010, 15:48 PM
5
 Rmustard | Thursday February 25, 2010, 10:27 AM
6
 Lyssa | Thursday February 11, 2010, 12:28 PM
7
 Snowedin | Friday January 1, 2010, 16:17 PM
8
 Denis | Wednesday March 10, 2010, 15:57 PM
9
 Ohara | Monday February 22, 2010, 13:57 PM
10
 Newsmcnabb | Thursday February 25, 2010, 15:10 PM
View Top 100 Commentors

Austin Post Top Authors

  •   lois
  • Points : +51

Let's Use Hitler?

Tuesday September 22, 2009 - 8:40 am - By Patjdixon

Tyranny of the Majority

Thursday September 10, 2009 - 10:29 am - By Patjdixon

Nature's Way: Woods, Economics, and Libertarians

Thursday August 27, 2009 - 8:38 am - By Patjdixon

Separation of Church and Signs

Saturday October 17, 2009 - 10:58 am - By Patjdixon

El Nino And Rain For Central Texas

Monday July 6, 2009 - 4:25 pm - By SamChapman

Austin Marathon and Half Marathon Race Plan, Part One

Saturday February 6, 2010 - 11:30 am - By Robhill